What is Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's Atlassian App Store audit score?

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow scored 61/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 80/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Atlassian listings.

What is Workzone: PullRequest Workflow doing well?

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 100/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 4 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Workzone: PullRequest Workflow loses its current edge in this category.

What can Workzone: PullRequest Workflow improve?

The weakest area in Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's audit is Languages, scored at 0/100. The failing checks are language count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.

AppRanks

Workzone: PullRequest Listing Audit — 61/100

Quick verdict

Generated from Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's audit data

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow scores 61/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 3 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and technical & support (42/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow

Independent listing audit — Atlassian

61/100·grade C·★ 4.84 (23)·audited today·0 changes in 30d

View app

61/100

Grade C

Critical gaps

Overall

61/100

weighted across 6 areas

Grade

needs lift

Last audit

today

refreshed 1h ago

Changes

0 30d

view history →

This is an independent listing audit for Workzone: PullRequest Workflow on Atlassian. It scored 61/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Atlassian listing.

Section breakdown

Detailed checks & fixes

Title Length30/50 chars
Title Keywords3 keywords found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title

Introduction249/150 chars
Intro Keywords23 unique keywords
Description976/5000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords77 unique keywords
Demo StoreNo demo store URL

High impact

Description

Your description uses 976 of 5000 characters. Expand it with features, benefits, and use cases.

App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found

High impact

Screenshot Count

Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.

Category Count4 categories
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed

Medium impact

Feature Tags

Add feature tags that describe your app's capabilities for better search matching.

Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing PlansNo pricing plans listed

Medium impact

Demo Store

Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.

Language CountNo languages listed

Medium impact

Language Count

Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.

Track how this score changes over time

Get alerts when Workzone: PullRequest Workflow or any rival changes their listing — free.

Start tracking free

Methodology

Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary

Explore further

HistoryWorkzone: PullRequest Workflow changes0 updates in 30d BenchmarkLanguages rankingWhere Workzone: PullRequest Workflow sits AppsWorkzone: PullRequest Workflow overviewReviews · keywords BestTop Atlassian appsBeyond Workzone: PullRequest Workflow MethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubric GlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections

Last updated: September 4, 2026

Quick verdict

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow

How Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's 61/100 breaks down

Frequently asked questions

What is Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's Atlassian App Store audit score?

What is Workzone: PullRequest Workflow doing well?

What can Workzone: PullRequest Workflow improve?

Explore further