Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence vs Workzone

Based on the data on this page, Workzone: PullRequest Workflow is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (799 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Workzone: PullRequest Workflow; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 799-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Workzone: PullRequest Workflow?

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 23 reviews) compared to Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★ from 799 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Workzone: PullRequest Workflow?

Workzone: PullRequest Workflow holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Workzone: PullRequest Workflow?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the deeper published review base (799 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (799 reviews). Workzone: PullRequest Workflow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (23 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Workzone: PullRequest Workflow?

Migration support varies by app and category. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Workzone: PullRequest Workflow both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Workzone: PullRequest Workflow" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.