Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Jira Workflow Toolbox | Workzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Automate and improve your processes! Jira Workflow Toolbox provides a great set of workflow functions to boost your Jira workflows, and automation rules to even go beyond. Supplemented by powerful custom fields that are calculated in real-time.
| Metric | Jira Workflow Toolbox | Workzone: PullRequest Workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 540 | 23 |
| Active installs | 4,849+ | 218+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Jira Workflow Toolbox edges out Workzone: PullRequest Workflow on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Jira Workflow Toolbox has the larger user base (540 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Workflow Toolbox; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's 23-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Workflow Toolbox's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jira Workflow Toolbox audit • Workzone: PullRequest Workflow audit
Jira Workflow Toolbox has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 540 reviews) compared to Workzone: PullRequest Workflow (4.8★ from 23 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Jira Workflow Toolbox holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Jira Workflow Toolbox has the deeper published review base (540 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jira Workflow Toolbox typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (540 reviews). Workzone: PullRequest Workflow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (23 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jira Workflow Toolbox and Workzone: PullRequest Workflow both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Workzone: PullRequest Workflow" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.