Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence vs AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence

3.8·220reviews·9,220+installs

Effortlessly transform Confluence pages into polished PDF documents with Scroll PDF Exporter

Shopify

Change

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence	Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence
Tagline	“Aura is an app for Confluence which introduces an intuitive suite of content macros transforming boring pages into beautiful organized content. The intuitive usage & the beautiful results of Aura macros will boost user experience & user acceptance.”248 chars	“Effortlessly transform Confluence pages into polished PDF documents with Scroll PDF Exporter”92 chars
Description	248 / 5000 chars5% used	92 / 5000 chars2% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	Shopify	Shopify
Developer	Aura Apps (Seibert - appanvil) \| Formatting, Intranet, Workflow, Approval, Table Filter, Analytics, Karma & Mantra	K15t
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—

Feature comparison between AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence
Metric	AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence	Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence
Rating	★ 4.0 ★	3.8 ★
Total reviews	164	★ 220
Active installs	4,543+	9,220+
Free plan	—	—
Built for Shopify	—	—

AppRanks verdict

Generated from live data on this page

AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence edges out Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence on rating (4.0★ vs 3.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has the larger user base (220 reviews vs 164), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence's 220-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence audit • Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence audit

Keyword	AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence	Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence
form	#51	Not ranked

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Which has better reviews, AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence or Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence?

AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 164 reviews) compared to Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence (3.8★ from 220 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence or Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence?

It depends on what you're optimizing for. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence or Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has more onboarding documentation maturity (220 reviews vs 164), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace stores?

AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (164 reviews). Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (220 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence?

Migration support varies by app and category. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence vs AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence

Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence

1. Listing metadata

AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence

At a glance

AppRanks verdict

4. Categories & rankings

5. Search rankings