Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Aura is an app for Confluence which introduces an intuitive suite of content macros transforming boring pages into beautiful organized content. The intuitive usage & the beautiful results of Aura macros will boost user experience & user acceptance.
| AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
Generate professional PDFs from your Confluence content with full control over styling. Export single pages or entire page trees seamlessly. Export versions, variants, translations, & other third-party app content.
| Metric | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 212 | ★ 228 |
| Active installs | 4,266+ | 8,907+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $0.5/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence edges out Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence at From $0/yr, Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence at From $0.5/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence's 228-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence audit • Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| form | #52 | Not ranked |
Both AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence offer paid plans only. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence starts at From $0/yr; Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence starts at From $0.5/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 212 reviews) compared to Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence (4.7★ from 228 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has the deeper published review base (228 vs 212), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (212 reviews). Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.