SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)

3.6·95reviews·791+installs

Configure time to SLA for Jira. Set SLA conditions, goals and get notification about breached issues.

Shopify

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)
Tagline	“Jira Project Portfolio Management (PPM): Manage projects & team capacity in excel spreadsheet-like tables with advanced hierarchy”129 chars	“Configure time to SLA for Jira. Set SLA conditions, goals and get notification about breached issues.”101 chars
Description	129 / 5000 chars3% used	101 / 5000 chars2% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	Shopify	Shopify
Developer	Tempo Software	SaaSJet
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—	—

4. Categories & rankings

Shared categories on the same row · in-category position inline

At a glance

5 metrics · auto-computed

Feature comparison between Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)
Metric	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)
Rating	3.6 ★	★ 3.6 ★
Total reviews	★ 401	95
Active installs	14,064+	791+
Free plan	—	—
Built for Shopify	—	—

AppRanks verdict

Generated from live data on this page

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) are evenly matched on rating (3.6★ vs 3.6★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (401 reviews vs 95), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) audit

Keyword	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)
time	Not ranked	#29

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Which has better reviews, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (3.6★, 401 reviews) and SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) (3.6★, 95 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)?

It depends on what you're optimizing for. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more onboarding documentation maturity (401 reviews vs 95), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace stores?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (401 reviews). SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (95 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)?

Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SLA Time and Report for Jira (Manage, Track, and Alert SLAs)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.