AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence vs HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes

HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes and AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes offers a free tier (Free) while AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence starts at From $0/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the larger user base (212 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes or AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence cheaper?

HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes or AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence?

HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes (5.0★, 22 reviews) and AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence (5.0★, 212 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes or AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence?

HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, HTML Macro Pro for Confluence FREE - Embed HTML and iframes or AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the deeper published review base (212 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.