- Title Length15/50 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator UsageNo separator found
Loading content…
Microsoft Teams
Independent listing audit — Zoom
43/100·grade D·16 open checks·★ 4.9 (7)·0 changes in 30 days·audited Oct 19, 2026
Quick verdict
Microsoft Teams scores 43/100 (grade D) — 7 fails and 9 warnings across 21 checks.
Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Audited Oct 19, 2026.
Top fixes
- Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
- Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
- Description (Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing
43/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when Microsoft Teams or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How Microsoft Teams's 43/100 breaks down
Microsoft Teams's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points).
The rubric — its 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands — is identical for every Zoom App Marketplace listing and is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is Microsoft Teams's Zoom listing audit score?
Microsoft Teams scores 43/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 33/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. The rubric is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable.
What is Microsoft Teams doing well?
Microsoft Teams's strongest section is Title Optimization at 63/100; 1 of 4 checks in it pass and 3 are open.
What should Microsoft Teams fix first?
Description & Content: Description (Missing; high impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score — more than any other section; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.
Explore further
- Microsoft Teams listing history0 detected changes in the last 30 days.
- Primary-category audit benchmarkHow Microsoft Teams's 43/100 compares with the top-audited listings in its primary Zoom category.
- Microsoft Teams app overviewPricing, features, ratings and rankings for Microsoft Teams on Zoom.
- Compare Microsoft Teams with another appPut Microsoft Teams side by side with a rival Zoom listing.
- All Zoom listing auditsBrowse audit scores for other Zoom apps.
- How the audit is scoredThe 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands.