- Title Length9/50 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title KeywordsOnly 1 keyword found
- Brand Name PositionTitle doesn't start with a clear brand name
Loading content…
subsciety
Independent listing audit — Zoom
41/100·grade D·16 open checks·21 measured · 21 total·0 changes in 30 days·audited Nov 11, 2026
Quick verdict
subsciety scores 41/100 (grade D) — 8 fails and 8 warnings across 21 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score.
Top strength: three sections score 50/100 — Title Optimization, Description & Content and Visual Assets. Audited Nov 11, 2026.
Top fixes
- Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
- Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
- Description (Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing
41/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when subsciety or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How subsciety's 41/100 breaks down
subsciety's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: three sections score 50/100 — Title Optimization, Description & Content and Visual Assets. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Zoom App Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is subsciety's Zoom listing audit score?
subsciety scores 41/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 33/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is subsciety doing well?
three of subsciety's sections tie for the top score of 50/100: Title Optimization, Description & Content and Visual Assets; 4 of 11 checks in them pass and 7 are open.
What should subsciety fix first?
Description & Content: Description (Missing; high impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.
Explore further
- subsciety listing history0 detected changes in the last 30 days.
- Primary-category audit benchmarkHow subsciety's 41/100 compares with the top-audited listings in its primary Zoom category.
- subsciety app overviewPricing, features, ratings and rankings for subsciety on Zoom.
- Compare subsciety with another appPut subsciety side by side with a rival Zoom listing.
- All Zoom listing auditsBrowse audit scores for other Zoom apps.
- How the audit is scoredThe 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands.