10WebSocial WordPress App Listing Audit: 33/100

Quick verdict

10WebSocial scores 33/100 (grade D) — 8 fails and 11 warnings across 21 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords, Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 18.7 points on the overall score.

Top strength: two sections score 50/100 — Title Optimization and Visual Assets. Audited Oct 24, 2026.

Top fixes

Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
Introduction (Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing

How 10WebSocial's 33/100 breaks down

10WebSocial's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: two sections score 50/100 — Title Optimization and Visual Assets. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords, Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 18.7 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Categories & Discoverability (up to 12.5 points), Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across WordPress Plugin Directory listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is 10WebSocial's WordPress listing audit score?

10WebSocial scores 33/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 25/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is 10WebSocial doing well?

two of 10WebSocial's sections tie for the top score of 50/100: Title Optimization and Visual Assets; 2 of 7 checks in them pass and 5 are open.

What should 10WebSocial fix first?

Description & Content: Introduction (Missing; high impact), Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description (5/5000 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Description Keywords (Only 1 keyword(s); medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 18.7 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

10WebSocial