- Title Length38/70 chars
- Title Keywords5 keywords found
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator UsageUses separator to structure title
Loading content…
Quick verdict
Generated from Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's audit data
Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields scores 53/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 4 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and technical & support (42/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields
Independent listing audit — WordPress
53/100·grade D·★ 4.8 (418)·audited today·0 changes in 30d
53/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Overall
53/100
weighted across 6 areas
Grade
D
needs lift
Last audit
today
refreshed 1h ago
Changes
0 30d
view history →
This is an independent listing audit for Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields on WordPress. It scored 53/100 (grade D) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical WordPress listing.
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Explore further
HistoryPods – Custom Content Types and Fields changes0 updates in 30dBenchmarkLanguages rankingWhere Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields sitsAppsPods – Custom Content Types and Fields overviewReviews · keywordsBestTop WordPress appsBeyond Pods – Custom Content Types and FieldsMethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubricGlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections
Last updated: July 15, 2026
How Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's 53/100 breaks down
Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's overall score of 53/100 is a mid-tier result — the listing is functional but multiple categories have headroom, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 2 categories score above the headline number and 4 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (100/100, +47 vs overall); the weakest is Languages (0/100), a 53-point gap below the headline score — the largest single lever. Top three by score: Title Optimization (100), Categories & Discoverability (63), Description & Content (50).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every WordPress Plugin Directory listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
What is Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's Wordpress App Store audit score?
Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields scored 53/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Wordpress listings.
What is Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields doing well?
Explore further
- Compare Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields with another appStack Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's title optimization score (100/100) against a rival listing on WordPress Plugin Directory.
- Browse WordPress Plugin Directory appsSee how other WordPress Plugin Directory listings handle languages — Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's weakest category at 0/100.
- Audit metrics glossaryDefinitions for the Title Optimization and Languages checks used on this audit, plus the rest of the AppRanks vocabulary.
- Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields audit historyScore timeline for Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields — see whether the 53/100 result is improving, holding, or slipping.
- Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields on WordPress Plugin DirectoryPricing, features, ratings, and the live WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace summary for Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields.
- What is an audit score?Why Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields landed at 53/100 — the canonical definition, weightings, and refresh cadence.
- Top-rated WordPress Plugin Directory appsSee where Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields's mid-tier 53/100 places it against the WordPress Plugin Directory's highest-rated apps.