What is Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields's Wordpress App Store audit score?

Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields scored 51/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 40/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Wordpress listings.

AppRanks

Native Custom Fields Listing Audit — 51/100

Quick verdict

Generated from Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields's audit data

Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields scores 51/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 4 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and description & content (40/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.

Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields

Q: What can Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields improve?

The weakest area in Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields's audit is Languages, scored at 0/100. The failing checks are language count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.

Independent listing audit — WordPress

51/100·grade D·audited today·0 changes in 30d

View app

51/100

Grade D

Critical gaps

Overall

51/100

weighted across 6 areas

Grade

needs lift

Last audit

today

refreshed 1h ago

Changes

0 30d

view history →

This is an independent listing audit for Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields on WordPress. It scored 51/100 (grade D) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical WordPress listing.

Section breakdown

Detailed checks & fixes

Title Length59/70 chars
Title Keywords8 keywords found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title

IntroductionMissing
Intro KeywordsNo keywords in introduction
Description2952/5000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords174 unique keywords
Demo StoreNo demo store URL

High impact

Introduction

Add an app introduction. This is the first text users see — make it compelling.

App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found

High impact

Screenshot Count

Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.

Category Count5 categories
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed

Medium impact

Feature Tags

Add feature tags that describe your app's capabilities for better search matching.

Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing PlansNo pricing plans listed

Medium impact

Demo Store

Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.

Language CountNo languages listed

Medium impact

Language Count

Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.

Track how this score changes over time

Get alerts when Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields or any rival changes their listing — free.

Start tracking free

Methodology

Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary

Explore further

HistoryNative Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields changes0 updates in 30d AppsNative Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields overviewReviews · keywords BestTop WordPress appsBeyond Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields MethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubric GlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections

Last updated: September 3, 2026

Quick verdict

Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields

How Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields's 51/100 breaks down

Frequently asked questions

What is Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields's Wordpress App Store audit score?

What is Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields doing well?

What can Native Custom Fields – Custom Content Types and Meta Fields improve?

Explore further