- Title Length9/70 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title KeywordsOnly 1 keyword found
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Loading content…
Gutenberg
Independent listing audit — WordPress
38/100·grade D·17 open checks·21/21 checks measured·★ 2.1 (3,883)·0 changes in 30 days·audited Oct 22, 2026
Quick verdict
Gutenberg scores 38/100 (grade D) — 8 fails and 9 warnings across 21 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its three open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description) is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Audited Oct 22, 2026.
Top fixes
- Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
- Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
- Introduction (Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing
38/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when Gutenberg or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How Gutenberg's 38/100 breaks down
Gutenberg's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its three open checks (Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description) is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Categories & Discoverability (up to 12.5 points), Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across WordPress Plugin Directory listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is Gutenberg's WordPress listing audit score?
Gutenberg scores 38/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 38/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is Gutenberg doing well?
Gutenberg's strongest section is Title Optimization at 63/100; 2 of 4 checks in it pass and 2 are open.
What should Gutenberg fix first?
Description & Content: Introduction (Missing; high impact), Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description (2878/5000 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact). Fixing them is worth up to 15.6 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.
Explore further
- Gutenberg listing history0 detected changes in the last 30 days.
- Primary-category audit benchmarkHow Gutenberg's 38/100 compares with the top-audited listings in its primary WordPress category.
- Gutenberg app overviewPricing, features, ratings and rankings for Gutenberg on WordPress.
- Compare Gutenberg with another appPut Gutenberg side by side with a rival WordPress listing.
- All WordPress listing auditsBrowse audit scores for other WordPress apps.
- How the audit is scoredThe 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands.