Sliders Wix App Listing Audit: 66/100

Quick verdict

Sliders scores 66/100 (grade C) — 4 fails and 15 warnings across 32 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Technical & Support — fixing its four open checks (Privacy Policy, FAQ, Documentation and Tutorial) is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score.

Top strength: two sections score 75/100 — Description & Content and Visual Assets. Audited Oct 22, 2026.

Top fixes

Title Keywords (Title Optimization, high impact, up to 3.7 points) — Only 1 keyword found
Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags
Privacy Policy (Technical & Support, high impact, up to 2.5 points) — No privacy policy

How Sliders's 66/100 breaks down

Sliders's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: two sections score 75/100 — Description & Content and Visual Assets. Largest available rubric uplift: Technical & Support — fixing its four open checks (Privacy Policy, FAQ, Documentation and Tutorial) is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Description & Content (up to 6.2 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points), Visual Assets (up to 5 points) and Languages (up to 5 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Wix App Market listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is Sliders's Wix listing audit score?

Sliders scores 66/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 75/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 58/100, Languages 50/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is Sliders doing well?

two of Sliders's sections tie for the top score of 75/100: Description & Content and Visual Assets; 6 of 12 checks in them pass and 6 are open.

What should Sliders fix first?

Technical & Support: Privacy Policy (No privacy policy; high impact), FAQ (No FAQ; low impact), Documentation (No documentation link; low impact), Tutorial (No tutorial or guide; low impact). Fixing them is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

Sliders