Readable Wix App Listing Audit: 77/100

Quick verdict

Readable: WCAG Accessibility scores 77/100 (grade B) — 2 fails and 11 warnings across 32 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its five open checks (Description, Introduction, Intro Keywords, Feature List and Feature Clarity) is worth up to 7.8 points on the overall score.

Top strength: two sections score 100/100 — Title Optimization and Languages. Audited Oct 31, 2026.

Top fixes

Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags
Privacy Policy (Technical & Support, high impact, up to 2.5 points) — No privacy policy
Hero Video (Visual Assets, medium impact, up to 2.5 points) — No video content found

How Readable: WCAG Accessibility's 77/100 breaks down

Readable: WCAG Accessibility's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade B). Top strength: two sections score 100/100 — Title Optimization and Languages. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its five open checks (Description, Introduction, Intro Keywords, Feature List and Feature Clarity) is worth up to 7.8 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Technical & Support (up to 7.5 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points) and Visual Assets (up to 2.5 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Wix App Market listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is Readable: WCAG Accessibility's Wix listing audit score?

Readable: WCAG Accessibility scores 77/100 (grade B) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 69/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 50/100, Languages 100/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is Readable: WCAG Accessibility doing well?

two of Readable: WCAG Accessibility's sections tie for the top score of 100/100: Title Optimization and Languages; all 10 checks in them pass.

What should Readable: WCAG Accessibility fix first?

Description & Content: Description (1050/2000 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Introduction (27/200 chars — too short; medium impact), Intro Keywords (Only 2 keyword(s) — add more; medium impact), Feature List (3/5 features — add more; medium impact), Feature Clarity (3 feature(s) exceed 80 chars; low impact). Fixing them is worth up to 7.8 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 3 other sections have smaller open fixes.

Readable: WCAG Accessibility