OnVoard: Reviews scores 71/100 (grade B) — 3 fails and 15 warnings across 32 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Technical & Support — fixing its four open checks (Privacy Policy, FAQ, Documentation and Tutorial) is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Visual Assets at 88/100. Audited Nov 7, 2026.
Top fixes
Feature Tags(Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags
Privacy Policy(Technical & Support, high impact, up to 2.5 points) — No privacy policy
Hero Video(Visual Assets, medium impact, up to 2.5 points) — No video content found
71/100
Grade B
Needs work
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Title Length16/50 chars — under 50% of limit
Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title
Medium impact
Title Length
Your title uses only 16 of 50 available characters. Add relevant keywords to improve discoverability.
Introduction42/200 chars — too short
Intro Keywords5 unique keywords
Description1127/2000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords87 unique keywords
Feature List4/5 features — add more
Feature Clarity4 feature(s) exceed 80 chars
SEO Title16/60 chars
SEO Description42/160 chars
Medium impact
Introduction
Your introduction is only 42 characters. Use closer to 200 characters to fully describe your app.
App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot Count5 screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found
Screenshot Variety5 unique screenshots
Medium impact
Hero Video
Add a demo video to increase engagement — listings with videos get higher conversion rates.
Category Count1 primary category
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed
Medium impact
Feature Tags
Add feature tags that describe your app's capabilities for better search matching.
Demo StoreDemo store URL provided
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing Plans2 plan(s) with details
High impact
Privacy Policy
Add a privacy policy link — it's required by most marketplaces and builds trust.
Language CountOnly 1 language
EnglishEnglish supported
SpanishSpanish not listed
FrenchFrench not listed
GermanGerman not listed
PortuguesePortuguese not listed
Medium impact
Language Count
Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when OnVoard: Reviews or any rival changes their listing — free.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How OnVoard: Reviews's 71/100 breaks down
OnVoard: Reviews's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade B). Top strength: Visual Assets at 88/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Technical & Support — fixing its four open checks (Privacy Policy, FAQ, Documentation and Tutorial) is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Description & Content (up to 6.2 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points), Languages (up to 5 points), Title Optimization (up to 3.7 points) and Visual Assets (up to 2.5 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Wix App Market listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is OnVoard: Reviews's Wix listing audit score?
OnVoard: Reviews scores 71/100 (grade B) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 75/100, Description & Content 75/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 58/100, Languages 50/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is OnVoard: Reviews doing well?
OnVoard: Reviews's strongest section is Visual Assets at 88/100; 3 of 4 checks in it pass and 1 is open.
What should OnVoard: Reviews fix first?
Technical & Support: Privacy Policy (No privacy policy; high impact), FAQ (No FAQ; low impact), Documentation (No documentation link; low impact), Tutorial (No tutorial or guide; low impact). Fixing them is worth up to 6.2 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.