- Title Length29/50 chars
- Title Keywords3 keywords found
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator UsageUses separator to structure title
Loading content…
Quick verdict
Generated from Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's audit data
Coefficient: Slack for Sheets scores 66/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 3 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and technical & support (42/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
Coefficient: Slack for Sheets
Independent listing audit — Slack
66/100·grade C·audited today·0 changes in 30d
66/100
Grade C
Needs work
Overall
66/100
weighted across 6 areas
Grade
C
mid tier
Last audit
today
refreshed 1h ago
Changes
0 30d
view history →
This is an independent listing audit for Coefficient: Slack for Sheets on Slack. It scored 66/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Slack listing.
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when Coefficient: Slack for Sheets or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Explore further
HistoryCoefficient: Slack for Sheets changes0 updates in 30dBenchmarkLanguages rankingWhere Coefficient: Slack for Sheets sitsAppsCoefficient: Slack for Sheets overviewReviews · keywordsBestTop Slack appsBeyond Coefficient: Slack for SheetsMethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubricGlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections
Last updated: August 3, 2026
How Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's 66/100 breaks down
Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's overall score of 66/100 is a mid-tier result — the listing is functional but multiple categories have headroom, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (100/100, +34 vs overall); the weakest is Languages (0/100), a 66-point gap below the headline score — the largest single lever. Top three by score: Title Optimization (100), Visual Assets (88), Description & Content (70).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Slack Marketplace listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
What is Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's Slack App Store audit score?
Coefficient: Slack for Sheets scored 66/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 70/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Slack listings.
What is Coefficient: Slack for Sheets doing well?
Explore further
- Compare Coefficient: Slack for Sheets with another appStack Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's title optimization score (100/100) against a rival listing on Slack Marketplace.
- Browse Slack Marketplace appsSee how other Slack Marketplace listings handle languages — Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's weakest category at 0/100.
- Audit metrics glossaryDefinitions for the Title Optimization and Languages checks used on this audit, plus the rest of the AppRanks vocabulary.
- Coefficient: Slack for Sheets audit historyScore timeline for Coefficient: Slack for Sheets — see whether the 66/100 result is improving, holding, or slipping.
- Coefficient: Slack for Sheets on Slack MarketplacePricing, features, ratings, and the live Slack Marketplace marketplace summary for Coefficient: Slack for Sheets.
- What is an audit score?Why Coefficient: Slack for Sheets landed at 66/100 — the canonical definition, weightings, and refresh cadence.
- Top-rated Slack Marketplace appsSee where Coefficient: Slack for Sheets's mid-tier 66/100 places it against the Slack Marketplace's highest-rated apps.