Colla Slack App Listing Audit: 53/100

Quick verdict

Colla scores 53/100 (grade D) — 4 fails and 13 warnings across 23 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Description, Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score.

Top strength: Visual Assets at 75/100. Audited Nov 9, 2026.

Top fixes

Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Title Keywords (Title Optimization, high impact, up to 3.7 points) — Only 1 keyword found
Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags

How Colla's 53/100 breaks down

Colla's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Visual Assets at 75/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Description, Introduction, Intro Keywords and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points) and Visual Assets (up to 5 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Slack Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is Colla's Slack listing audit score?

Colla scores 53/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is Colla doing well?

Colla's strongest section is Visual Assets at 75/100; 2 of 4 checks in it pass and 2 are open.

What should Colla fix first?

Description & Content: Description (685/10000 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Introduction (88/300 chars — too short; medium impact), Intro Keywords (Only 2 keyword(s) — add more; medium impact), Description Keywords (Only 2 keyword(s); medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

Colla