跨拒通 Shopify App Listing Audit: 63/100

Quick verdict

跨拒通 scores 63/100 (grade C) — 4 fails and 17 warnings across 32 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description Keywords, Description and Feature List) is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score.

Top strength: two sections score 75/100 — Visual Assets and Categories & Discoverability. Audited Oct 25, 2026.

Top fixes

Title Keywords (Title Optimization, high impact, up to 3.7 points) — Only 1 keyword found
Intro Keywords (Description & Content, medium impact, up to 3.6 points) — No keywords in introduction
Description Keywords (Description & Content, medium impact, up to 3.6 points) — No keywords in description

How 跨拒通's 63/100 breaks down

跨拒通's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: two sections score 75/100 — Visual Assets and Categories & Discoverability. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description Keywords, Description and Feature List) is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points), Languages (up to 5.8 points), Visual Assets (up to 5 points), Technical & Support (up to 4.3 points) and Categories & Discoverability (up to 3.7 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Shopify App Store listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is 跨拒通's Shopify listing audit score?

跨拒通 scores 63/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 57/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 75/100, Technical & Support 71/100, Languages 42/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is 跨拒通 doing well?

two of 跨拒通's sections tie for the top score of 75/100: Visual Assets and Categories & Discoverability; 4 of 8 checks in them pass and 4 are open.

What should 跨拒通 fix first?

Description & Content: Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact), Description (168/500 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Feature List (3/5 features — add more; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

跨拒通