众潮科技POD定制 Shopify App Listing Audit: 58/100

Quick verdict

众潮科技POD定制 scores 58/100 (grade C) — 6 fails and 15 warnings across 31 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description Keywords, Description and Feature List) is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score.

Top strength: Visual Assets at 88/100. Audited Nov 1, 2026.

Top fixes

Category Count (Categories & Discoverability, high impact, up to 5 points) — No categories
Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 5 points) — No feature tags
Title Keywords (Title Optimization, high impact, up to 3.7 points) — Only 1 keyword found

How 众潮科技POD定制's 58/100 breaks down

众潮科技POD定制's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: Visual Assets at 88/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description Keywords, Description and Feature List) is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Categories & Discoverability (up to 10 points), Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points), Languages (up to 5.8 points), Technical & Support (up to 5.4 points) and Visual Assets (up to 2.5 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Shopify App Store listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is 众潮科技POD定制's Shopify listing audit score?

众潮科技POD定制 scores 58/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 57/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 33/100, Technical & Support 64/100, Languages 42/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is 众潮科技POD定制 doing well?

众潮科技POD定制's strongest section is Visual Assets at 88/100; 3 of 4 checks in it pass and 1 is open.

What should 众潮科技POD定制 fix first?

Description & Content: Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact), Description (183/500 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Feature List (4/5 features — add more; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 10.7 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

众潮科技POD定制