小诸葛ERP Shopify App Listing Audit: 66/100

Quick verdict

小诸葛ERP scores 66/100 (grade C) — 4 fails and 16 warnings across 32 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description, Description Keywords and Feature List) is worth up to 8.9 points on the overall score.

Top strength: Categories & Discoverability at 88/100. Audited Oct 30, 2026.

Top fixes

Title Keywords (Title Optimization, high impact, up to 3.7 points) — Only 1 keyword found
Intro Keywords (Description & Content, medium impact, up to 3.6 points) — No keywords in introduction
Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, medium impact, up to 2.5 points) — 4 screenshots — add more

How 小诸葛ERP's 66/100 breaks down

小诸葛ERP's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: Categories & Discoverability at 88/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Intro Keywords, Description, Description Keywords and Feature List) is worth up to 8.9 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points), Languages (up to 6.7 points), Visual Assets (up to 5 points), Technical & Support (up to 4.3 points) and Categories & Discoverability (up to 1.9 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Shopify App Store listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is 小诸葛ERP's Shopify listing audit score?

小诸葛ERP scores 66/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 64/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 88/100, Technical & Support 71/100, Languages 33/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is 小诸葛ERP doing well?

小诸葛ERP's strongest section is Categories & Discoverability at 88/100; 3 of 4 checks in it pass and 1 is open.

What should 小诸葛ERP fix first?

Description & Content: Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description (54/500 chars — under 60% of limit; high impact), Description Keywords (Only 1 keyword(s); medium impact), Feature List (3/5 features — add more; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 8.9 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

小诸葛ERP