iSyncSF | Native Salesforce Data Migration and Sandbox Seeding scores 66/100 (grade C) — 4 fails and 13 warnings across 29 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 88/100. Audited Nov 14, 2026.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
iSyncSF | Native Salesforce Data Migration and Sandbox Seeding's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: Title Optimization at 88/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Languages (up to 5 points), Description & Content (up to 4.2 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 3.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 1.9 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Salesforce AppExchange listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
iSyncSF | Native Salesforce Data Migration and Sandbox Seeding scores 66/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 88/100, Description & Content 83/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 75/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 50/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
iSyncSF | Native Salesforce Data Migration and Sandbox Seeding's strongest section is Title Optimization at 88/100; 3 of 4 checks in it pass and 1 is open.
Visual Assets: Screenshot Count (No screenshots; high impact), Hero Video (No video content found; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.
