Generated from Lightning Field Sets's audit data
Lightning Field Sets scores 65/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 3 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: languages holds at 92/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: technical & support (50/100) and visual assets (50/100) drag the average down; lifting technical & support is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
This is an independent listing audit for Lightning Field Sets on Salesforce. It scored 65/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Languages at 92/100. Biggest gap: Visual Assets at 50/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Salesforce listing.
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Last updated: September 12, 2026
Lightning Field Sets's overall score of 65/100 is a mid-tier result — the listing is functional but multiple categories have headroom, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Languages (92/100, +27 vs overall); the weakest is Technical & Support (50/100), 15 points below the overall — a meaningful but not dominant gap. Top three by score: Languages (92), Title Optimization (75), Description & Content (71).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Salesforce AppExchange listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Lightning Field Sets scored 65/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 75/100, Description & Content 71/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 50/100, Languages 92/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Salesforce listings.
Lightning Field Sets's strongest audit area is Languages, scored at 92/100. Of the 6 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 5 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Lightning Field Sets loses its current edge in this category.
The weakest area in Lightning Field Sets's audit is Visual Assets, scored at 50/100. The failing checks are screenshot count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.