Generated from Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce's audit data
Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce scores 64/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 3 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 88/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: technical & support (50/100) and visual assets (50/100) drag the average down; lifting technical & support is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
This is an independent listing audit for Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce on Salesforce. It scored 64/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 88/100. Biggest gap: Visual Assets at 50/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Salesforce listing.
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Last updated: September 12, 2026
Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce's overall score of 64/100 is a mid-tier result — the listing is functional but multiple categories have headroom, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 2 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (88/100, +24 vs overall); the weakest is Technical & Support (50/100), only 14 points below the overall — the score is already tightly bunched. Top three by score: Title Optimization (88), Languages (83), Description & Content (64).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Salesforce AppExchange listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce scored 64/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 88/100, Description & Content 64/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 50/100, Languages 83/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Salesforce listings.
Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 88/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 3 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce loses its current edge in this category.
The weakest area in Commercient's SYNC between IFS and Salesforce's audit is Visual Assets, scored at 50/100. The failing checks are screenshot count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.