API4COM - API de Voz scores 61/100 (grade C) — 4 fails and 9 warnings across 22 checks.
Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score.
Top strength: two sections score 88/100 — Title Optimization and Description & Content. Audited Nov 6, 2026.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
API4COM - API de Voz's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: two sections score 88/100 — Title Optimization and Description & Content. Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points), Description & Content (up to 3.1 points) and Title Optimization (up to 1.9 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Pipedrive Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
API4COM - API de Voz scores 61/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 88/100, Description & Content 88/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
two of API4COM - API de Voz's sections tie for the top score of 88/100: Title Optimization and Description & Content; 6 of 8 checks in them pass and 2 are open.
Visual Assets: Screenshot Count (No screenshots; high impact), Hero Video (No video content found; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.
