6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How Amber by inFeedo's 61/100 breaks down
Amber by inFeedo's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: three sections score 75/100 — Description & Content, Visual Assets and Categories & Discoverability. Largest available rubric uplift: Languages — fixing its one open check, Language Count (medium impact) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Description & Content (up to 6.2 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points), Visual Assets (up to 5 points) and Categories & Discoverability (up to 3.7 points).
The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Google Workspace Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is Amber by inFeedo's Google Workspace listing audit score?
Amber by inFeedo scores 61/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 75/100, Visual Assets 75/100, Categories & Discoverability 75/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.
What is Amber by inFeedo doing well?
three of Amber by inFeedo's sections tie for the top score of 75/100: Description & Content, Visual Assets and Categories & Discoverability; 7 of 12 checks in them pass and 5 are open.
What should Amber by inFeedo fix first?
Languages: Language Count (No languages listed; medium impact). Fixing it is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.