Generated from Microsoft Teams's audit data
Microsoft Teams scores 49/100 across 6 category checks, which indicates listing-quality gaps across 3 of 6 audited categories. Strengths: description & content (81/100) is the strongest category — installing for evaluation is fine, long-term confidence needs the gaps below addressed. Watch-items: categories & discoverability (17/100) and visual assets (17/100) drag the average down; lifting categories & discoverability is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
This is an independent listing audit for Microsoft Teams on Canva. It scored 49/100 (grade D) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Description & Content at 81/100. Biggest gap: Visual Assets at 17/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Canva listing.
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Last updated: September 9, 2026
Microsoft Teams's overall score of 49/100 is a result that signals significant listing weaknesses across multiple categories, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Description & Content (81/100, +32 vs overall); the weakest is Categories & Discoverability (17/100), a 32-point gap below the headline score — the largest single lever. Top three by score: Description & Content (81), Title Optimization (75), Languages (50).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Canva Apps listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Microsoft Teams scored 49/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a result that signals significant listing weaknesses. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 75/100, Description & Content 81/100, Visual Assets 17/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 50/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Canva listings.
Microsoft Teams's strongest audit area is Description & Content, scored at 81/100. Of the 8 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 6 pass cleanly and 1 fail outright; the rest sit in warning state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Microsoft Teams loses its current edge in this category.
The weakest area in Microsoft Teams's audit is Visual Assets, scored at 17/100. The failing checks are app icon, screenshot count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.