- Title Length20/50 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
- Brand Name PositionTitle doesn't start with a clear brand name
- Separator UsageNo separator found
Loading content…
prioritization_board scores 20/100 (grade D) — 10 fails and 11 warnings across 21 checks.
Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Introduction, Description, Intro Keywords and Description Keywords) is worth up to 25 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 50/100. Audited Oct 20, 2026.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
prioritization_board's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 50/100. Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its four open checks (Introduction, Description, Intro Keywords and Description Keywords) is worth up to 25 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Visual Assets (up to 16.7 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 12.5 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 7.5 points).
The rubric — its 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands — is identical for every Atlassian Marketplace listing and is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
prioritization_board scores 20/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 50/100, Description & Content 0/100, Visual Assets 17/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. The rubric is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable.
prioritization_board's strongest section is Title Optimization at 50/100; 0 of 4 checks in it pass and 4 are open.
Description & Content: Introduction (Missing; high impact), Description (Missing; high impact), Intro Keywords (No keywords in introduction; medium impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 25 points on the overall score — more than any other section; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.