Loading content…
TOP ATLASSIAN APPS YOU CAN COMPARE
Three highly-rated Atlassian apps to compare against Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence.
The top-rated Atlassian apps by rating × review-volume — a useful comparison baseline against Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts
Apps#1TOP PICK
4.811,204 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're surveying the marketplace
Widely used on this marketplace — not a like-for-like swap. AppRanks found no app sharing Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's category, so this is not a replacement for it — it is a widely-used apps option shown for market context. Compare it against your own requirements rather than as a swap.
Checklists for Jira (Free) by HeroCoders
Apps#2RUNNER-UP
4.791,008 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're cost-sensitive
Adjacent tool, different job. Different use case from Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence. Listed because it is among the most-adopted apps apps on this marketplace, not because it covers the same job.
ScriptRunner for Jira
Apps#3VALUE PICK
4.64822 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're mapping adjacent tooling
Popular alternative to evaluate on its own merits. Solves a different problem than Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence. Useful market context; verify the capability overlap yourself before treating it as an option.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON
Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence versus the top 3.
Five rows, all loaded above the fold. Wins are highlighted; nothing's hidden behind a tab.
RANKS #4 THROUGH #12
The next 9, denser.
Beyond the 0 same-category matches we found, these are widely-used Atlassian apps rather than direct replacements — useful for context, not like-for-like.
How these alternatives are ranked
Scored daily. Three signals, weighted and blended. No vendor money changes anything.
45%Feature similarity
N-gram match against Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's feature signature, weighted by category overlap.
35%Audit + rating
Listing quality (0–100) blended with rolling 90-day rating average. Penalizes thin listings.
20%Review velocity
Reviews added in trailing 30 days, normalized by category baseline. Surfaces rising challengers.
Every Atlassian alternative on this page is scraped, normalized, and re-scored every 24 hours. We don't accept paid placement, vendor-funded "best of" content, or sponsored ranking — and we publish the rules so you can audit them yourself. If a vendor disagrees with their position, that's between them and the data.
WHEN DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO SWITCH FROM NAVITABS - NAVIGATION MACROS FOR CONFLUENCE?
Four reasons people leave.
Decision triggers, not marketing. If two or more apply, your shortlist starts with the apps named below each card.
Pricing has outgrown your usage
If your usage of Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence has crossed a pricing-tier breakpoint, per-unit cost is usually where alternatives diverge most clearly. Some apps in the list above carry a free tier; others are paid from day one. Compare the published plans on each alternative's page against your current bill — the gap is the only number worth acting on, and it is specific to your usage.
Checklists for Jira (Free) by HeroCoders · draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & FlowchartsYou need a feature outside the focus
Each Atlassian category has a feature spectrum. The "Similar feature set" badge above marks alternatives whose feature signature most overlaps with Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence. The "Category leader" badge marks apps that may approach the same category from a different feature angle — useful if you want to widen rather than narrow your toolset.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & FlowchartsSupport response has slowed you down
Support quality is the hardest thing to read from a listing, and it is the most common reason a switch gets made. Read the most RECENT reviews on each alternative's profile rather than the lifetime average — recency is what tells you how the app is supported today, and trailing review velocity is the freshest signal AppRanks tracks.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
Answers built from the data.
Built from the same scores the ranking uses — so they won't contradict the table.
For most accounts under typical category usage, the answer depends on tier. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is in the paid band (From $0/yr), while Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence is paid (From $0/yr). At parity scale, the cheaper option can save 30–60% — but feature-for-feature swaps usually narrow the gap above the second tier.
VERDICT · UPDATED TODAY
If you're moving from Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence, the most common landing spots are draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts (unknown feature match, audit null/100) and Checklists for Jira (Free) by HeroCoders (pricing leverage + breadth). Skip Jira Workflow Toolbox unless your use case is unusual.
If feature parity matters most
→ draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts
Unknown feature parity. Audit null, 4.81★.
If pricing matters most
→ Checklists for Jira (Free) by HeroCoders
Best for cost-sensitive teams. 4.79★ across 1,008 reviews.
If you're scaling enterprise
→ ScriptRunner for Jira
Strongest scale fit when category usage exceeds typical thresholds. Vendor-evaluate before committing.
Continue your research
Audit Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's listing
See where Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence ranks 0–100 on listing completeness, screenshots, and description quality.
Open auditNavitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence vs draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts
Side-by-side feature deltas, shared keywords, rating curves over the trailing 12 months.
Open compareAtlassian category leaders
Highest-rated Atlassian apps by intent. The category-by-category leaderboard.
Open best