Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| TriCaster | Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| TriCaster | Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Impress your customers with memorable virtual Nametags directly in your meetings.
| Metric | TriCaster | Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 58 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 4.0★ vs TriCaster's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TriCaster's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TriCaster audit • Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls audit
| Keyword | TriCaster | Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls |
|---|---|---|
| name | Not ranked | #1 |
| calls | Not ranked | #1 |
| virtual | Not ranked | #5 |
No tracked changes.
Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 58 reviews) compared to TriCaster (3.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls has the deeper published review base (58 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
TriCaster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (58 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TriCaster and Nametags - Virtual business cards for video calls both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TriCaster" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.