Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Allow AI Companion and Zoom Virtual Agent to find, summarize, automate and reference Outlook emails and calendar for faster insights and management.
| Outlook for Zoom | Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Outlook for Zoom | Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Outlook for Zoom is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook for Zoom; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook for Zoom's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook for Zoom audit • Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex audit
Outlook for Zoom has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex (3.4★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Outlook for Zoom fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace marketplace. Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex has more onboarding documentation maturity (5 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Outlook for Zoom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (5 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook for Zoom and Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Outlook for Zoom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
