Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Participation & Speaking Time Tracker | Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Keep your meetings fair and equitable by tracking speaking time in your Zoom meetings & webinars. Participation charts easily visible right in Zoom!
| Metric | Participation & Speaking Time Tracker | Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 9 | 7 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Participation & Speaking Time Tracker is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 4.0★ vs Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex's 3.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Participation & Speaking Time Tracker; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Participation & Speaking Time Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Participation & Speaking Time Tracker audit • Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex audit
| Keyword | Participation & Speaking Time Tracker | Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex |
|---|---|---|
| track | #7 | Not ranked |
| time | #28 | Not ranked |
| zoom | Not ranked | #33 |
Participation & Speaking Time Tracker has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex (3.1★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Participation & Speaking Time Tracker holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Participation & Speaking Time Tracker has the deeper published review base (9 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Participation & Speaking Time Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Participation & Speaking Time Tracker and Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Zoom for ChatGPT & Codex" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
