Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Timer | ZP for Zoom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Timer | ZP for Zoom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Make any Zoom meeting accessible by adding a sign language interpreter on the spot with ZP for Zoom
| Metric | Timer | ZP for Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 56 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
ZP for Zoom edges out Timer on rating (4.0★ vs 3.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ZP for Zoom; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timer's 56-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ZP for Zoom's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Timer audit • ZP for Zoom audit
| Keyword | Timer | ZP for Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| time | #11 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
ZP for Zoom has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Timer (3.7★ from 56 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ZP for Zoom holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Timer has the deeper published review base (56 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Timer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (56 reviews). ZP for Zoom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timer and ZP for Zoom both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ZP for Zoom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.