Participation & Speaking Time Tracker vs Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports

Based on the data on this page, Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Participation & Speaking Time Tracker's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Participation & Speaking Time Tracker's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports or Participation & Speaking Time Tracker?

Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Participation & Speaking Time Tracker (4.0★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports or Participation & Speaking Time Tracker?

Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports or Participation & Speaking Time Tracker?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Participation & Speaking Time Tracker has the deeper published review base (9 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Zoom App Marketplace teams?

Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Participation & Speaking Time Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports and Participation & Speaking Time Tracker?

Migration support varies by app and category. Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports and Participation & Speaking Time Tracker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.