Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Make any Zoom meeting accessible by adding a sign language interpreter on the spot with ZP for Zoom
| Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat | ZP for Zoom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Generate automatic summaries, transcripts, action items, and get insights from your meetings (English-only)
| Metric | Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat | ZP for Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ZP for Zoom is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 4.0★ vs Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ZP for Zoom; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ZP for Zoom's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat audit • ZP for Zoom audit
| Keyword | Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat | ZP for Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| meeting | #5 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
ZP for Zoom has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat (3.5★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ZP for Zoom holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat has the deeper published review base (4 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). ZP for Zoom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat and ZP for Zoom both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ZP for Zoom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
