Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Confluence is a collaboration tool that helps teams create, share, organize content and automate content management workflow.
| Confluence for Zoom | GitHub for Zoom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Confluence for Zoom | GitHub for Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, GitHub for Zoom is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Confluence for Zoom's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to GitHub for Zoom; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Confluence for Zoom's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GitHub for Zoom's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Confluence for Zoom audit • GitHub for Zoom audit
No tracked changes.
GitHub for Zoom has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Confluence for Zoom (4.6★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
GitHub for Zoom holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Confluence for Zoom has the deeper published review base (5 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Confluence for Zoom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). GitHub for Zoom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Confluence for Zoom and GitHub for Zoom both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub for Zoom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
