Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Use Gong for Zoom Meetings to make the most of your call. Gong records, transcribes and analyzes each call and provides actionable insights.
| Sponja | Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Sponja | Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 2 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Sponja and Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Sponja audit • Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level audit
| Keyword | Sponja | Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level |
|---|---|---|
| gong for zoom | Not ranked | #3 |
| gong | Not ranked | #3 |
| zoom meeting | Not ranked | #3 |
Sponja (5.0★, 2 reviews) and Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Sponja does carry the larger published review base (2 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Sponja has the deeper published review base (2 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Sponja typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Sponja and Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gong for Zoom Meetings - User level" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
