Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Automatically publish Zoom cloud recordings to YouTube — into the right playlist, with email confirmation. Multi-destination backup coming soon.
| PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube | Sugar Calendar Bookings | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Automatically create unique Zoom meetings for every booking made through Sugar Calendar Bookings. Clients get a personalized Zoom link instantly.
| Metric | PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube | Sugar Calendar Bookings |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 1 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Sugar Calendar Bookings's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sugar Calendar Bookings's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube audit • Sugar Calendar Bookings audit
| Keyword | PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube | Sugar Calendar Bookings |
|---|---|---|
| youtube | #2 | Not ranked |
| calendar | Not ranked | #26 |
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube does carry the larger published review base (1 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Sugar Calendar Bookings typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PublishFlow for Zoom & YouTube and Sugar Calendar Bookings both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sugar Calendar Bookings" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
