Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Build a beautiful event page, track guest registrations, sell tickets, collect donations, send invites, share to social media and more.
| Luma Beautiful Event Pages | User Interviews | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Do user research faster than ever with tools to streamline recruiting, incentives, and scheduling— now with seamless Zoom integration.
| Metric | Luma Beautiful Event Pages | User Interviews |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, User Interviews is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Luma Beautiful Event Pages's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to User Interviews; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Luma Beautiful Event Pages's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than User Interviews's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Luma Beautiful Event Pages audit • User Interviews audit
| Keyword | Luma Beautiful Event Pages | User Interviews |
|---|---|---|
| interviews | Not ranked | #1 |
| interview | Not ranked | #6 |
| view | Not ranked | #8 |
| event | #10 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
User Interviews holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. User Interviews has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Luma Beautiful Event Pages typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). User Interviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Luma Beautiful Event Pages and User Interviews both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Luma Beautiful Event Pages" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
