Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Flowtrace Integration | Participation & Speaking Time Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Keep your meetings fair and equitable by tracking speaking time in your Zoom meetings & webinars. Participation charts easily visible right in Zoom!
| Metric | Flowtrace Integration | Participation & Speaking Time Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 9 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Participation & Speaking Time Tracker is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 4.0★ vs Flowtrace Integration's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Participation & Speaking Time Tracker; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Flowtrace Integration's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Participation & Speaking Time Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Flowtrace Integration audit • Participation & Speaking Time Tracker audit
| Keyword | Flowtrace Integration | Participation & Speaking Time Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| track | Not ranked | #7 |
| time | Not ranked | #28 |
| integration | #29 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Participation & Speaking Time Tracker does carry the larger published review base (9 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Participation & Speaking Time Tracker has the deeper published review base (9 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Flowtrace Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Participation & Speaking Time Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Flowtrace Integration and Participation & Speaking Time Tracker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flowtrace Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
