Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Review, copy, and paste your Zoom AI Scribe clinical notes directly into your EHR — supporting both telehealth and in-person visit workflows.
| Epic FHIR | Zoom Clinical Notes Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Epic FHIR | Zoom Clinical Notes Extension |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Zoom Clinical Notes Extension is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Epic FHIR's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Zoom Clinical Notes Extension; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Epic FHIR's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Zoom Clinical Notes Extension's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Epic FHIR audit • Zoom Clinical Notes Extension audit
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Zoom Clinical Notes Extension does carry the larger published review base (1 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Zoom Clinical Notes Extension has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Epic FHIR typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Zoom Clinical Notes Extension typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Epic FHIR and Zoom Clinical Notes Extension both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Epic FHIR" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
