Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| DeepL Voice | Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Generate automatic summaries, transcripts, action items, and get insights from your meetings (English-only)
| Metric | DeepL Voice | Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.7 ★ | 3.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Free plan | — | — |
DeepL Voice edges out Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat on rating (3.7★ vs 3.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to DeepL Voice; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than DeepL Voice's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: DeepL Voice audit • Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat audit
| Keyword | DeepL Voice | Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat |
|---|---|---|
| meeting | Not ranked | #5 |
| voice | #10 | Not ranked |
DeepL Voice has the higher average rating (3.7★ from 3 reviews) compared to Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat (3.5★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
DeepL Voice holds the higher average rating (3.7★ vs 3.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat has the deeper published review base (4 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
DeepL Voice typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. DeepL Voice and Otter.ai - Meeting Summary, AI Chat both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from DeepL Voice" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
