Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Teachfloor 2.0 | Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
🙋 Automatically take attendance in your meetings & webinars. Download or email XLS and CSV reports to track who joined & participated.
| Metric | Teachfloor 2.0 | Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports is the stronger choice for most Zoom App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Teachfloor 2.0's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Teachfloor 2.0's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoom App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Teachfloor 2.0 audit • Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports audit
| Keyword | Teachfloor 2.0 | Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports |
|---|---|---|
| automatic | Not ranked | #1 |
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports does carry the larger published review base (5 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoom App Marketplace. Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports has the deeper published review base (5 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Teachfloor 2.0 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Teachfloor 2.0 and Attendance Taker - Automatic Attendee Reports both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Teachfloor 2.0" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
