Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Microsoft Teams for Orchestly | Slack for Orchestly | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Connect and collaborate with different teams in your organization.
| Metric | Microsoft Teams for Orchestly | Slack for Orchestly |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 2 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Listed since | Feb 2020 | Aug 2018 |
Microsoft Teams for Orchestly and Slack for Orchestly are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Microsoft Teams for Orchestly at Free, Slack for Orchestly at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Microsoft Teams for Orchestly audit • Slack for Orchestly audit
Both Microsoft Teams for Orchestly and Slack for Orchestly offer paid plans only. Microsoft Teams for Orchestly starts at Free; Slack for Orchestly starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Microsoft Teams for Orchestly (5.0★, 1 reviews) and Slack for Orchestly (5.0★, 2 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Slack for Orchestly does carry the larger published review base (2 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace. Slack for Orchestly has the deeper published review base (2 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Microsoft Teams for Orchestly typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Slack for Orchestly typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Microsoft Teams for Orchestly and Slack for Orchestly both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Microsoft Teams for Orchestly" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.