Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google Drive for Orchestly | Checklist for Zoho Projects | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google Drive for Orchestly | Checklist for Zoho Projects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 147 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Listed since | Aug 2018 | Nov 2018 |
Based on the data on this page, Checklist for Zoho Projects is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace teams — 4.0★ vs Google Drive for Orchestly's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Google Drive for Orchestly at Free, Checklist for Zoho Projects at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Checklist for Zoho Projects has the larger user base (147 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Drive for Orchestly's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Checklist for Zoho Projects; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Drive for Orchestly's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Checklist for Zoho Projects's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Drive for Orchestly audit • Checklist for Zoho Projects audit
Both Google Drive for Orchestly and Checklist for Zoho Projects offer paid plans only. Google Drive for Orchestly starts at Free; Checklist for Zoho Projects starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Checklist for Zoho Projects has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 147 reviews) compared to Google Drive for Orchestly (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Checklist for Zoho Projects holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace. Checklist for Zoho Projects has the deeper published review base (147 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Drive for Orchestly typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Checklist for Zoho Projects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (147 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Drive for Orchestly and Checklist for Zoho Projects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Drive for Orchestly" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.