Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Hybrid Project Mangement for the modern workplace—Work seamlessly with classic teams and agile teams alike
| Acefone for Zoho | Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Acefone for Zoho | Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 17 | ★ 23 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | Nov 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, Acefone for Zoho is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Acefone for Zoho at Free, Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Acefone for Zoho; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects's 23-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Acefone for Zoho's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Acefone for Zoho audit • Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects audit
No tracked changes.
Both Acefone for Zoho and Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects offer paid plans only. Acefone for Zoho starts at Free; Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Acefone for Zoho has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 17 reviews) compared to Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects (4.2★ from 23 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Acefone for Zoho holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace. Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects has the deeper published review base (23 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Acefone for Zoho typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (23 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Acefone for Zoho and Zoho Sprints for Zoho Projects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Acefone for Zoho" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.