Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Connect, Authentication, OAuth, PKCE, Google, Box, Dropbox, Facebook, Twitter, QuickBooks, Xero, SalesForce, Ringcentral
| oauth-connect | Acefone for Zoho | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | oauth-connect | Acefone for Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 17 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed since | Nov 2017 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Acefone for Zoho is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs oauth-connect's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Acefone for Zoho offers a free tier (Free) while oauth-connect starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Acefone for Zoho; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — oauth-connect's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Acefone for Zoho's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: oauth-connect audit • Acefone for Zoho audit
No tracked changes.
Acefone for Zoho is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). oauth-connect starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Zoho Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Acefone for Zoho has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 17 reviews) compared to oauth-connect (1.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. oauth-connect fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Acefone for Zoho is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace marketplace. Acefone for Zoho has more onboarding documentation maturity (17 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
oauth-connect typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). Acefone for Zoho aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (17 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. oauth-connect and Acefone for Zoho both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from oauth-connect" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.