Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Pingdom | Acefone for Zoho | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Pingdom | Acefone for Zoho | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Pingdom | Acefone for Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 17 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Acefone for Zoho is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Pingdom's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Pingdom at Free, Acefone for Zoho at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Acefone for Zoho; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pingdom's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Acefone for Zoho's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Pingdom audit • Acefone for Zoho audit
No tracked changes.
Both Pingdom and Acefone for Zoho offer paid plans only. Pingdom starts at Free; Acefone for Zoho starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Acefone for Zoho has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 17 reviews) compared to Pingdom (4.5★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Pingdom fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Acefone for Zoho is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace marketplace. Acefone for Zoho has more onboarding documentation maturity (17 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Pingdom typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). Acefone for Zoho aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (17 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pingdom and Acefone for Zoho both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pingdom" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.