Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Derive valuable insights on your deals and keep your sales up and running.
| Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq | Zoho Expense | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq | Zoho Expense |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 5 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Listed since | Feb 2020 | Jul 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Zoho Expense is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq at Free, Zoho Expense at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Zoho Expense; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Zoho Expense's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq audit • Zoho Expense audit
No tracked changes.
Both Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq and Zoho Expense offer paid plans only. Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq starts at Free; Zoho Expense starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Zoho Expense does carry the larger published review base (5 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace. Zoho Expense has the deeper published review base (5 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Zoho Expense typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq and Zoho Expense both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pipedrive For Zoho Cliq" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.