Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Import checks from multiple companies and make payments seamlessly using Online Check Writer
| Check Printing for Zoho Books | QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Check Printing for Zoho Books | QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 158 | 5 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Listed since | Jul 2021 | Mar 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Check Printing for Zoho Books's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Check Printing for Zoho Books offers a free tier (Free) while QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Check Printing for Zoho Books has the larger user base (158 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Check Printing for Zoho Books's 158-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Check Printing for Zoho Books audit • QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books audit
Check Printing for Zoho Books is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Zoho Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Check Printing for Zoho Books (4.7★ from 158 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace. Check Printing for Zoho Books has the deeper published review base (158 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Check Printing for Zoho Books typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (158 reviews). QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Check Printing for Zoho Books and QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from QuiXcel ETA Zoho Books" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.